论文部分内容阅读
《航空史研究》总第50期的《再谈孙中山并无向冯如“苦心劝说”—与“孙中山曾向冯如‘苦心劝说’作者商榷》(简称《再谈》)一文,对拙作《孙中山曾向冯如“苦心劝说”》(载《航空史研究》总第45期)提出异议,并举出孙中山并无向冯如“苦心劝说”的三点理由.由于这三点理由所据以立论的事实系属凭空想像,故均属错误.为免错误辗转流传,特在此再作讨论.
“The history of aviation history,” the first 50 “talk about Sun Yat-sen did not Fengru” painstaking persuasion “- and” Sun Yat-sen Feng to ’painstaking persuasion’ “author (” talk again “ Sun Yat-sen filed an objection to Feng Ru’s ”painstaking persuasion“ (No. 45 of ”Studies in the History of Aviation Science“), and gave three reasons why Sun Yat-sen did not ”vowed to persuade Feng." Because of these three reasons The fact that the argument is illusory is a mistake, and for the avoidance of mistakes, it is discussed here again.