论文部分内容阅读
知识产权质权制度自1995年《担保法》明文规定以来,虽有一定程度的发展,但并不繁荣。2007年《物权法》虽然进一步系统化了知识产权质权的相关制度,但与迅猛发展的经济现实相比,这些规定依然显得简单粗略。知识产权质权制度与中小企业的融资关系紧密,因此,完善知识产权质权制度对解决中小企业融资难问题将大有裨益。从世界范围内来看,在英美法系国家中有以美国为代表的将知识产权质权统一规定在动产担保交易法中并适用统一规则的模式,也有以英国法为代表的在知识产权设定抵押权或者负担的模式;在大陆法系国家中有以德国为代表的在民法典权利质权中统一涵盖知识产权质权的模式,也有我国台湾地区除了在“民法典”权利质权中统一规定外,还在知识产权单行法中规定知识产权质权的模式。严格意义上,我国现行模式不属于这几种模式的任何一种。国外制度对我国知识产权质权制度的借鉴意义究竟在哪里?本文将从统一登记,完善价值评估机制等方面进行探索。
Since the promulgation of the “Guarantee Law” in 1995, the Pledge of Intellectual Property rights system has not prospered despite its development to some extent. Although the Property Law of 2007 further systematized the relevant system of intellectual property pledge, these provisions are still simple and crude compared with the rapid economic development. The Pledge of Intellectual Property System is closely related to the financing of SMEs. Therefore, improving the system of Pledge of Intellectual Property rights will be of great help in solving the financing difficulty of SMEs. From the perspective of the world, there is a model in the Anglo-American legal system in which the United States represents the unification of the pledge of intellectual property rights in the law of movable property transactions and the application of uniform rules. There is also a model of intellectual property rights Fixed mortgage or burden model; in the civil law countries represented by Germany in the pledge of civil law pledge of intellectual property rights in a unified model, but also in Taiwan, China in addition to the “Civil Code” In addition, it also stipulates the mode of intellectual property pledge in the law of intellectual property. Strictly speaking, the current mode of our country does not belong to any of these modes. What is the significance of foreign system to China’s Pledge of Intellectual Property system? This article will explore from the aspects of unified registration and perfecting the mechanism of value assessment.