拜读了陕西陈润平的“答疑’[钱币研究1994(1)],很觉奇怪。因为拙文[钱币研究1994(1)]并没有要求解答疑问,而是针对陈润平“英文错版陕西铜元”[钱币专辑(11)]一文中的观点提出讨论,指出了该文中“英文”的错误说法。在陈文中写道“……经查对英汉词典,只有TYPEF……加词头IM……”,不知查对了那本英汉词典?对于稍懂英文的人来说,其错误是太明显了。最令人不解的是,在“答疑”一文中还写道“……由于有关陕西铜元上的外文字母是英文还是罗马文, It is very strange to read Chen Ans Ping’s Q & A [Journal of Coins 1994 (1)] in Shaanxi Province, because Chen Zhuo [Coinage Studies 1994 (1)] did not ask questions, (11)], pointing out the erroneous notion of “English” in the article. “In the Chen Wenzhong wrote:” ...... After checking the English-Chinese dictionary, only TYPEF ... adds the prefix IM ... “ To the English-Chinese dictionary, the mistake is obvious: the most puzzling thing is that in the article entitled ”Q & A" Letters are in English or Roman,