论文部分内容阅读
随着国内辩诉交易第一案———牡丹江铁路运输法院就被告人孟广虎故意伤害案的审结,在中国刑事司法实践中首次亮相的“辩诉交易”日益成为学界关注的焦点。自实行改革开放以来,我国的犯罪数量一直呈上升趋势,而我国刑事诉讼资源并没有太大增长,所以,犯罪数量与司法资源之间的矛盾已经成为我国刑事诉讼的主要矛盾。首例辩诉交易的诞生,显示了辩诉交易制度在我国移植和应用的生命力。那么,我国究竟是否应该引进辩诉交易制度?我国现有的制度环境是否有适合辩诉交易制度生存的土壤呢?本文对此作了粗浅的探讨。
With the first case of domestic plea bargaining - the conclusion of the intentional injury case of MENG Guang-hu by Mudanjiang Railway Transportation Court, the “plea bargaining debut” debuted in Chinese criminal justice practice has increasingly become the focus of academic attention. Since the implementation of the reform and opening up, the number of crimes in our country has been on an upward trend. However, the resources of criminal procedure in our country have not increased so much. Therefore, the contradiction between the number of crimes and the judicial resources has become the main contradiction of criminal proceedings in our country. The birth of the first plea bargain shows the vitality of transplantation and application of plea bargaining system in our country. So, should our country introduce the system of plea bargaining or not? Whether the existing institutional environment in our country is suitable for the survival of plea bargaining system?