论文部分内容阅读
回顾20世纪80年代关于实践唯物主义的讨论,我们认为还是应坚持辩证唯物主义,因为其一,“实践唯物主义”这一名称完全是后人的错误引申,绝非马克思和恩格斯的原意;其二,从道理上讲,绝不能把实践的唯物主义理解为实践唯物主义;其三,本体论思维方式没有过时,而且永远不会过时;其四,认识论、实践论、主体论、人学等研究不但不会取代本体论研究,而且是与之互补的,应该摆对它们与本体论的关系;其五,客观世界是存在的,辩证唯物主义的产生是与19世纪以来自然科学革命的根本精神完全一致的,而20世纪现代自然科学的发展和人类社会文明的进步也是同辩证唯物主义完全一致的。
In retrospect of the discussions on practical materialism in the 1980s, we think that dialectical materialism should still be upheld because, first, the name “practical materialism” is completely a misrepresentation by future generations and is by no means the original intention of Marx and Engels ; Second, from the truth, the materialism of practice can never be understood as practical materialism; Third, the ontological way of thinking is not out of date, and will never be out of date; Fourth, epistemology, theory of practice, the main theory, people Science and other studies not only do not replace the study of ontology, but also complement each other, and should put their relationship with ontology; Fifth, the objective world exists, the emergence of dialectical materialism and the natural science revolution since the nineteenth century . The development of the modern natural sciences in the 20th century and the progress of civilization in human society are also exactly the same as dialectical materialism.