论文部分内容阅读
二王、米芾都是书法史上不可逃避的必谈人物,历来研究二王与米芾的学者不少,涉及到书论、书法技法、作品鉴定等等。《长风帖》历来被认为是褚遂良临王羲之的墨迹,多数书目著录此帖都沿袭此说。事实却并非如此简单,关于《长风帖》与《鹅群帖》二帖也有学者怀疑是米芾作品,但也都没定论。[1]笔者将对笔迹进行进一步的比对,并加入“睿思东阁”印的讨论,希望能够为《长风帖》、《鹅群帖》与米芾关系的研究提供一些新的思考。
The two kings and meters are all inevitable figures in the history of calligraphy. Historically, there have been many scholars who study the two kings and meters. They are involved in calligraphy, calligraphy techniques, works identification and so on. “Chang Feng Tie” has always been regarded as the ink of Chu Xiuliang’s visit to Wang Xizhi, and most bibliographic records follow this. The fact is not so simple. There are also scholars who suspect that Mi Chang works on the two posts of “Chang Feng Tie” and “Geese Herd Posts.” However, they are still inconclusive. [1] The author will further compare the handwriting and join the discussion of “Rui Si Dong Ge”, hoping to provide some new research on the relationship between “Chang Feng”, “Geese” and Mi Mi Thinking.