论文部分内容阅读
李诚《五马图》自元初周密著录以来,一直被错认错定为李公麟所作,且被认为是李公麟画人马的代表作画上的签题也被错认为是黄庭坚手笔。本文从史源学年代学考证入手,发掘第一手史源学材料,考定《五马图》错定为李公麟所作是始自元初周密,同时的戴表元、赵孟頫等人作诗随合周密之说,以后便举世盲从,一直沿误至今。经考证,李公麟当年从来不曾画过《五马图》。李诚工书,入能品,又善画。墓志记载李诚有《五马图》,贡入内廷,宋徽宗睿鉴称善。李诚博学多能,又著有《马经》三卷。《五马图》所画名马多记出由来、岁口和身高,不同于一般绘画创作,而是为名马建立簿籍档案,应是《马经》配套之作。所绘五马皆现场写生,绘画水平极高,功力绝不在李公麟之下。画上题笺出自李诚手笔,行楷之工,功力也应与黄庭坚不相上下。
Li Cheng’s “Five-horse Map” has been mistakenly identified as Li Gonglin’s mistakes since the first week of the Yuan Dynasty. His signature on the representative painting of Li Gonglin was also mistakenly considered as Huang Tingjian’s handwriting. This article starts with the chronological research of Shi Yuanxue, excavating the first-hand historiography materials, examining the “five-horse map” as the mistake of Li Gong-lin from the beginning of the first week of Zhou Dynasty, while wearing the watch, Zhao Meng- , After the world blind obedience, has been along the wrong so far. After research, Li Gonglin never painted “five horses map.” Li Cheng Gong book, into energy products, good painting. The epitaph Li Cheng has “five horses map”, tribute to the inner court, Hui Huizong Jian said good. Li Cheng learned more energy, but also the “horse by” three volumes. “Five Horse Map” by the name of Mado to remember the origin, age and height, is different from the general painting, but the establishment of books and magazines archives, should be “Matheson” matching. Painted five horses are live sketches, painting a very high skill by no means under Li Gonglin. The title of the painting from Li Cheng handwriting, Xingkai work, skill should be comparable with Huang Tingjian.