论文部分内容阅读
读了1988年《湖南中医杂志》第6期发表的“对忽视炮制所致事故11例的分析”(以下简称“分析”)一文后,笔者感触颇深,非常赞同“调剂人员要遵医嘱,依法炮制,配方发药,方能有效地治疗疾病,达到预期效果。忽视炮制,也可造成危害”的观点。但作者声称“在整理历年医疗事故资料时,发现1例胎漏病人使用生蒲黄而引起大流血的事故”的提法是不客观的。下面笔者谈谈对“分析”一文的一点看法:(一)病历摘要欠妥病历云:“因
After reading the article “Analysis of 11 Cases of Accidents Caused by Ignoring Processing” published in the 6th issue of “Hunan Traditional Chinese Medicine” in 1988, the author felt very deep and strongly endorsed “The regulators should follow the doctor’s instructions. The idea of concocting and formulating medicines in accordance with the law can effectively treat diseases and achieve the desired results, and neglecting concocting can also cause harm.“ However, the author claimed that ”in collating the medical incident data over the years, it was not objective to mention that one case of a fetus who had missed a fetus was found to have caused a large-blooded accident using raw Puhuang.“ The following author’s point of view on the ”analysis" article is: (a) The medical records are ill-digested.