谁都明白,当王南溟喊出“批评家连‘坐台’的机会都没有了”的时候,他所渴求的不是“坐台”的权利,而是从制度上根除“坐台”的任何可能。或许,最让王南溟愤怒与无奈的是:随着他批评力度的加大,他所渴求的艺术理想却在我们这块土地上离他越来越远。这也是他在文中不得不发些狠话,比如“没有真正政治改革的任何一种改革都是一种反动,而不是一种进步”。其实,王南溟强调的艺术制度的建立也正是经济学家一以贯之的一个观点。他们以为,未来社会的竞争,不是资金的竞争,也不是人才的竞争。因为资金、人才都是可以全球流动的。唯有制度的完善与建立才是固定的。当今社会,有了好的制度,也就不难保有资金与人才,甚至社会的可持续发展。然而,我的问题是,什么样的制度才是好的制度?所谓制度,也就是大家必须共同遵守的办事规程,而规程的意义又是为进行操作或执行某种制度而作的具体规定。就我国目前的艺术制度言,多的是规程,少的是制度。这是因为 Everyone understands that when Wang Nanming shouted out that “there is no chance for critics to even get on with Taiwan,” he is not seeking the right to “sit on the table,” but to eradicate the system “ ”Any possible. Perhaps, most let Wang Nanming angry and helpless: As he intensified criticism, he is desirous of artistic ideals in our land but farther and farther from him. This is why he has to make ruthless remarks in the text. For example, “Any kind of reform without real political reform is a reactionary one, not a progressive one.” In fact, the establishment of the art system emphasized by Wang Nanming is exactly what economists have always followed. They think that the competition in the future society will not be the competition of funds or the competition of talents. Because of funding, talent is global mobility. Only the perfection and establishment of the system is fixed. In today’s society, with a good system, it is not hard to retain the funds and talents, and even the sustainable development of society. However, my question is: What kind of system is a good system? The so-called system, that is, all the rules of procedure that we must all abide by, and the meaning of the rules are the specific provisions for the operation or implementation of a certain system. As far as the current art system in our country is concerned, it is more of a procedure and less of a system. This is because