论文部分内容阅读
本文通过对不安抗辩权基本概念及不安抗辩权行使的主体、前提条件、法律效力的分析,阐述我国立法对不安抗辩权行使方面的法律规定;另一方面通过对不安抗辩权行使在司法实践中存在的“隐性重合”、“举证责任过重”等诸多问题的分析,提出笔者的见解,以期不安抗辩权在行使过程中能更加合理的保护先履行方的合同权益。
Through the analysis of the main concepts, preconditions and legal effects of the basic concepts of insecurity right and the exercise of uneasiness, this article expounds the legal provisions on the exercise of insecurity right in our country’s legislation. On the other hand, through the exercise of the right of insecurity in judicial practice The existence of “implicit overlap ”, “burden of proof ” and many other issues analysis, put forward the author’s opinion, in order to unease the right of defense in the exercise process can be more reasonable protection of the parties to fulfill the contractual rights and interests.