在过去的二十五年间,我们为之持续努力的自然法理论激起了众多的批评性反应。我们已经在不同作品中重述了该理论,但却未引起人们对这些发展的关注。在考虑这些批判之后,本文重新阐述了该理论的某些组成部分。我们还附上了一个有注解的精选参考书目。Ⅰ.序言A.敬请注意的若干事项虽然本文之意旨在于哲学上的澄清与论证而不是文本解释,但是它还是应用了我们借由开创了自己理论的自然法传统(广义上即托马斯主义)中的一些共同语言。但是与亚里士多德、托马斯·阿奎那以及其他人所表述的理论相比,我们在这里所说的呈现出了形形色色的不同。在先前的著作中——这些著作或多或少地涵盖着与本文相同的理论基 The theory of natural law for which we have worked for the past twenty-five years has sparked many critical reactions. We have restated this theory in different works but have not drawn the attention of people to these developments. After considering these critiques, this article reinterprets some of the components of the theory. We have also attached an annotated selection of bibliographies. I. Preface A. Some things to keep in mind Although the purpose of this article is philosophical clarification and argumentation rather than textual interpretation, it applies the tradition of natural law that we developed by our own theory (in the broadest sense of Thomism) Some common language. But what we are talking about here presents all kinds of differences in comparison with the theories expressed by Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas and others. In previous writings - these books cover more or less the same theoretical basis as this article