论文部分内容阅读
民事裁判思考是一个分阶段的理性论证过程。一般认为,民事裁判思考过程分为发现事实、寻找法律和适用法律三个阶段。从认识科学和裁判实践来看,民事裁判思考过程应分为浏览式思考和实证性思考(包括发现事实、寻找法律和适用法律)两阶段。两阶段裁判思考路径作为一种法学方法论,具有域内的普适性,对裁判效益的提高、司法公正的实现意义非凡。
Civil referees thinking is a phased rational argument process. Generally believed that the process of thinking of civil judgments is divided into the discovery of facts, looking for law and applicable law in three stages. From the understanding of science and referee practice, civil judgment process should be divided into browsing thinking and empirical thinking (including the discovery of facts, to find law and applicable law) two stages. As a jurisprudence methodology, the thinking path of the two-stage referee has the universality within the domain, which is of great significance to the improvement of the referee’s benefits and the realization of judicial fairness.