论文部分内容阅读
西方通过以“资源稀缺论”和“效用价值论”为核心的“资源价格学”的研究,形成了以权利金为主的分配机制,避免了资本获取超额利润。而中国的资源开发收益分配情况恰恰相反。以内蒙古为例,在2012年采矿业收益中,非国有资本获取了除了资产收益以外的租金收益和超额利润。其原因是,中国有关资源经济理论滞后于资源开发与分配。为了避免资源领域的经济寡头向政治寡头演进,应该建立与完善合理有效的矿山权利金制度,使行为主体的收益率接近社会平均收益率。
In the West, through the study of “resource price study” with “scarcity of resources ” and “utility value theory ” as the core, the distribution mechanism based on royalties was formed and capital was prevented from obtaining excessive profits. However, China’s income distribution of resources development is just the opposite. In Inner Mongolia, for example, non-state capitals earned rental income and excess profits other than asset returns in 2012 mining revenues. The reason is that China’s theory of resource economy lags behind resource development and distribution. In order to avoid the evolution of the oligarchs in resources to the oligarchs, a reasonable and effective mine royalty system should be set up and perfected to make the rate of return of the actors close to the average social rate of return.