论文部分内容阅读
刑法变通实质上是民族自治地方在犯罪与刑罚方面所享有的立法自治权。由于认识的局限及历史的惯性,相关法律的冲突和实际操作的难度,国家制定法预设的刑法变通的空间至今尚未得到有效利用,浪费了极其稀缺的立法资源。基层刑事司法实践中以刑事政策和习惯法为依据所采取的变通做法并不能完全弥补刑法变通缺位的不足。对与刑法变通相关的条款进行重新规范和设计,能够解决现行条款在逻辑上的冲突和实际操作的困难;准确理解和运用刑事政策,释放现有法律的空间,可以在刑法变通缺失的情形下,充分发挥刑法变通应有的机能。
The criminal law modification is essentially the legislative autonomy enjoyed by ethnic autonomous areas in terms of crimes and penalties. Due to the limitation of cognition and the inertia of history, the conflict of relevant laws and the difficulty of practical operation, the space of the premeditated criminal law modification of state law has not yet been effectively utilized and the extremely scarce legislative resources have been wasted. At the basic level of criminal justice practice, criminal law and customary law as the basis for the adoption of alternative practices can not fully compensate for the deficiencies of the criminal law. The re-specification and design of the articles related to the criminal law’s modification can solve the logic conflict and practical difficulties of the current articles. The accurate understanding and application of the criminal policy and the release of the space of the existing law can be used in the absence of the criminal law , Give full play to the due transformation of criminal law functions.