20世纪以来,“废除死刑运动”已扩展到全球范围,主张废除死刑的国家重人权,讲人道,令人敬佩。然而,正是某些上述国家却同时以战争方式大量杀人,即一边尊重人权,一边践踏人权;一边对罪大恶极的罪犯生命严加保护,一边又对无辜平民大开杀戒。这种矛盾现象极大地动摇了人们对于人权、人道的是非判断标准,也使学界陷入思维的两难境地。废除死刑与允许战争杀人之间矛盾由来已久。古代东西方的历史,很大程度上是战争写成的。然而,就在这腥风血雨的时代,却矛盾地出现过“废除死刑”的现象。例如,西罗马帝国的后100年没有执行过死刑,屠杀、征服、奴役行为与尊重人生命的“废除死刑”行为 Since the 20th century, the “Campaign to Abolish the Death Penalty” has been extended to a global scale. The countries that advocate the abolition of the death penalty are human rights, humanitarian and admirable. However, it is precisely some of the above-mentioned countries that simultaneously massacre by means of war, that is, while respecting human rights while trampling on human rights while strictly protecting the innocent civilians while strictly protecting the lives of the most criminals of criminality. This contradiction has greatly shaken people’s non-judgmental standards of human rights and humanity, and has left the academic community in a dilemma of thinking. The conflict between the abolition of the death penalty and the war killings has been protracted. The history of the ancient East and the West was written to a large extent by the war. However, in this era of reign of terror, there has been a contradiction in the phenomenon of “abolishing the death penalty.” For example, the death penalty, massacre, conquest, enslavement and the “abolition of death penalty” have not been implemented in the last 100 years of the Western Roman Empire