1992年,以泉州37家国有企业“一揽子合资”(或称之为一揽子收购)为背景的国有产权交易案例,作为一个富有争议的话题,曾引起海内外众多人士的关注。随着时间的推移,人们或许对此事渐渐淡漠了,但是,当我们再次踏上泉州这块土地,对这种“一揽子合资”的实际运作过程深入调查后发现,仅仅从国有资产收益的角度对当初的交易行为做出价值判断,难免会得出过于简单的结论。事实上,三年后的今天(1995年末)再对泉州的合资模式进行剖析,人们会发现一些远比“姓资还是姓社”、“姓中还是姓外”更有理论价值和实践意义的问题。 In 1992, as a controversial topic, the case of state-owned equity transactions in the context of 37 state-owned enterprises and “a joint venture” (or “blanket acquisition”) in Quanzhou had attracted the attention of many people at home and abroad. Over time, people may gradually become indifferent to this matter. However, when we again set foot on the land in Quanzhou, we have conducted an in-depth investigation of the actual operation process of this “blanket joint venture” and discovered that only proceeds from state-owned assets From the perspective of making value judgments on the original trading behavior, it will inevitably lead to overly simple conclusions. In fact, after three years (towards the end of 1995) analyzing the joint venture model in Quanzhou, people will find that they are far more theoretically valuable than “surname or surname community”, “surname or surname”. And practical issues.