论文部分内容阅读
清代乾嘉间著名学者段玉裁与顾广圻梳理各自校勘理念,形成了两套立场鲜明的理论,对校勘学发展影响深远,后人称之为“段顾之争”。通过梳理当时的历史情境可以发现,这场争论与当时学术风气、二人治学门径关系密切。这既是乾嘉时期两种校勘倾向的一次正面碰撞,又包含着段顾二人对两种倾向的审视和深化。段玉裁将古籍文本的校勘纳入小学研究的体系中,通过校勘获得“可靠”的文本,以支持文字音韵训诂诸领域的考证,因此主张突破传世古本的限制。顾广圻的“不校校之”则是从自己长期从事版本鉴定、古籍校勘实践的经验出发提出的富有现实意义的校勘模式。
In the Qing Dynasty, Duan Yucai and Gu Guangtao, famous scholars of Qianghui and Jiaqing, sorted out their own concepts of collation and formed two sets of distinct theories, which have a far-reaching impact on the development of collation. By combing the historical context at that time, we can see that this debate was closely related to the academic atmosphere and the path of the two scholarship. This is both a positive collision of the two kinds of collation tendency in the Qianghua period and a review and deepening of the two tendencies by Gu and Du. Duan Yucai incorporated the collation of ancient texts into the system of elementary school research, obtained “reliable” texts through collation to support the textual research of textual rhymes, and therefore advocated the breakthrough of the limitations of ancient texts. Gu Guangtao “not school ” is from its own long engaged in version identification, the practice of ancient collation of experience put forward realistic realistic collation mode.