论文部分内容阅读
我国新修订的《民事诉讼法》第五十六条第三款规定了第三人撤销之诉这项新制度,其目的在于使合法权益受到侵害的第三人能够获得有效的司法救济,从而抑制恶意诉讼。但该项制度仅一条规定过于简疏,影响其实际适用,本文从我国与他国之间对该项制度的比较入手,提出我国第三人撤销之诉这项新规定的不足,对于其后的相关制度的构建提出具体的建议,建立完整的第三人权利保障体系。
Paragraph 3 of Article 56 of the Civil Procedure Law newly amended in our country stipulates the third system of revocation of litigation. The purpose of this new system is to enable third parties whose legitimate rights and interests have been infringed to obtain effective judicial remedies so that Suppress malicious litigation. However, only one provision of this system is too simplistic, affecting its practical application. This article starts with the comparison of this system between our country and other countries, and proposes the deficiency of the new provision of the third party revocation in our country. The establishment of the relevant system put forward specific proposals to establish a complete third party rights protection system.