我对《军事历史》杂志很感兴趣,故真诚地希望: 一、学术研究、回忆文章、军事史料等,要力求新颖、准确,对那些人们较为熟悉的事件应尽量少登,空泛的大块理论文章应力求精炼。做到学术性、史料性、可读性兼容。二、尽力创造学术争鸣的气氛。纵览《军事历史》公开发行以来的文章,感觉有独家独揽,正统规范的味道。学术上要提倡各抒己见,不要给人以千篇一律之感;栏目及选题也应注意博采众家之长。三、军事冲突,必有敌我双方,研究军事史既要知己,又要知彼。研究我军战史,应注意涉及敌军史 I am very interested in “Military History” magazine. I sincerely hope: First, academic research, memorial articles, military historical materials, etc., should strive to be novel and accurate. As to the people who are more familiar with the event should be as little as possible, Theoretical articles should strive to be refined. Achieve academic, historical, readable compatibility. Second, try our best to create the atmosphere of academic contention. Looking at the articles published since the publication of “Military History,” I feel like I had an exclusive monopoly on the orthodoxy. Academic to promote their own opinions, do not give the feeling of stereotypes; columns and topics should also be drawn to draw upon the length of the public. Third, there must be both the enemy and ourselves in military conflicts. It is necessary to study military history not only as a friend but also as a neighbor. Study of the history of our military, should pay attention to the history of the enemy