论文部分内容阅读
目的:对临床免疫检验的质量控制方法及其效果展开分析。方法:选取我院检验的126份免疫检验血液样本为研究对象,将在质量控制前接收的血样作为对照组,将经过质量控制后接收的血样作为观察组。对两组血样质控方面的差异以及检验的效果进行分析与比较。结果:观察组血液样本的C肽、Ca125、Ca199、甲胎蛋白、血清胰岛素及癌胚抗原等变异指数要显著低于对照组,数据差异显著,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:血液样本的采集、检测仪器的使用以及试剂的选择等因素均会对临床免疫检验的结果造成影响。因此,临床检验人员就需要做好血液样品的质量控制工作,从而为临床诊治提供更加准确的检验数据。
Objective: To analyze the quality control method of clinical immunity test and its effect. Methods: We selected 126 blood samples from our hospital for immunoassay as the study subjects. We took the blood samples received before quality control as the control group and the blood samples after the quality control as the observation group. The differences of blood quality control between the two groups and the test results were analyzed and compared. Results: The C-peptide, Ca125, Ca199, AFP, serum insulin and carcinoembryonic antigen in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group. The data showed significant difference (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Factors such as blood sample collection, the use of instrumentation, and the choice of reagents all have an impact on the results of a clinical immunoassay. Therefore, clinical examiners need to do a good job in the quality control of blood samples to provide more accurate test data for clinical diagnosis and treatment.