论文部分内容阅读
儒学与佛学都在关注“人”,但其所关注的角度是不一样的,这一点在儒家颜元的《存人编》和佛家宗密的《华严原人论》中表现得很明显。在《存人编》中,颜元探讨“什么样的人才是一个真正的人”,其答案是只有实践了儒家“人伦”关系的人才是一个真正的人;而在《华严原人论》中,宗密则探讨“人的本质究竟是什么”,其答案是“人本来是佛”。可以看出,颜元着眼于人的实践形态,是要对人作出一个符合儒学的价值判断,而宗密则着眼于人的本来形态,是要对人作出一个符合佛学的事实判断,两者的这种差别体现了儒佛两家“人学”思想的不同进路,即儒学的实践进路和佛学的形而上学进路。
Confucianism and Buddhism are all concerned with “people”, but their perspectives are not the same. This is manifested in Confucianism Yen-yuan’s “Preserved human beings” and Buddhism Zongmi’s “Inhumanity” obvious. Yan Yuan explores “what kind of talent is a real person” in “Preserving Personal Editing”, and the answer is that only those who practice the relationship of Confucian “human relations” are a real person; while “ In the case of Zong Mi, ”what is the essence of human nature“ is discussed. The answer is ”people are originally Buddhists." It can be seen that Yan Yuan focuses on man’s practical form in order to make a value judgment that conforms to Confucianism, whereas Zong Mi looks at the original form of man in order to make a factual judgment that is in line with Buddhism. Both of them This difference reflects the different approaches of Confucianism and Buddhism’s two theories of human studies, that is, the Confucianism practice and the philosophical metaphysics.