论文部分内容阅读
《关于办理利用网络实施诽谤等刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》将网络空间解释为公共场所从而适用寻衅滋事罪。通过对“公共场所”核心含义的解释、其立法目的的均衡以及国民的预测可能性分析,网络空间均可以被解释为“公共场所”。另外,这一解释结论符合了发展变化的社会事实,对“公共场所”的内涵予以了丰富和更新。将网络空间视为“公共场所”不仅是在刑法解释限度内允许的解释还是一次将传统刑法适用于网络空间、应对日益猖獗的网络犯罪的建设性尝试。由此追问刑法解释的限度,目的解释应限定在文义可能的含义范围之内、罪刑法定原则之下和犯罪构成的框架之内。这一问题的实质为立法权和解释权的分野。
The Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in Handling Criminal Cases of Use of Internet to Defamation, etc. The interpretation of cyberspace as public places can be applied to provoke trouble. Through the interpretation of the core meaning of “public places ”, the equilibrium of legislative purposes and the analysis of the national probability of prediction, cyberspace can be interpreted as “public places ”. In addition, the conclusion of this interpretation is in line with the social facts of development and change, and the connotation of “public places” is enriched and updated. To think of cyberspace as “public place ” is not only a permissible explanation within the limits of interpretation of criminal law, but also a constructive attempt to apply traditional criminal law to cyberspace in response to the growing cybercrime. Therefore, the limits of the interpretation of criminal law, the purpose of interpretation should be limited within the scope of the possible meanings of the text, under the principle of legality and crime within the framework of the crime. The essence of this issue is the distinction between legislative power and interpretative power.