读过几本《胡适传》的人大概都会有胡适事迹烂熟于胸的潜意识,可是真正动手去研究胡适却仿佛处处有疑问,在在是空白。这话当然不是对过去所有刊行的《胡适传》而言的。实际上,胡适研究在大陆虽然起步较晚,所获却不可谓不丰,胡适研究随之而成显学,更是有目共睹。犹记得几年前出版的一本《胡适传论》中,因所附的专家推荐评语中有类如以往的胡适传“大都质量平平,水准不高”一句,便引起前出的胡适传记作者的很大不满。说起来,这本身也属见 Hundreds of people who read “Hu Shih Chuan” probably have a subconscious of being familiar with Hu Shih’s deeds. However, it is still blank to study Hu Shi as if he had anything in common. This is certainly not the case for “Hu Shixuan”, which was all published in the past. In fact, although Hu Shishu’s research started relatively late in the Mainland, it has been greatly improved. Hu Shi’s study has become a significant science. It is even more obvious to all. I still remember a book published a few years ago in the “Hu Shi Biography,” because of the accompanying experts’ comments in the category like the previous Hu Shih-chuan, "Mostly mediocre quality, low standard, Biographers are very dissatisfied. In speaking, this too belongs to you