华生等同志的《中国改革十年:回顾、反思和前景》一文发表后,引起了广泛的争议。《经济研究》1989年第2期刊载了石小敏。刘吉瑞的商榷文章《经济学家首先要尊重历史和事实》,以期引起讨论。本刊这一期刊载的李德伟等同志的文章也属商榷之列,目的是同样的。我们一贯赞同这样的观点:学术界的争论商榷是繁荣学术不可或缺的重要途径。特别是当争论的问题从学术理论更深入地逼近中国经济社会发展的实质性问题时,就更有必要把它广泛推开。在改革开放十年的今天,认真回顾已走过的路程,从中总结经验和教训,无疑具有如何评价都不过分的重要意义。我们欢迎并希望更多的同志参加这种争论,以进一步推动经济理论和政策科学的发展 Watson and other comrades, “China’s reform decade: review, reflection and prospects,” a article published, aroused widespread controversy. “Economic Research” 1989 the second issue of Shi Xiaomin. Liu Jirui’s discussion article “Economists must first respect history and facts,” with a view to arousing discussion. Articles published in this issue of Li Dewei and other comrades articles are also open to the discussion, the purpose is the same. We have always agreed with the view that the academic debate is an indispensable and important way to prosper the academic world. In particular, it is even more necessary to widen the debate when it comes to approaching the substantive issues of economic and social development in China more deeply from academic theories. In the ten years of reform and opening up, it is undoubtedly of great importance to evaluate how we evaluate the seriousness of the journey we have gone through and sum up our experience and lessons learned. We welcome and hope more comrades will participate in this debate to further promote the development of economic theory and policy science