90年代初 ,传入我国的后殖民批评理论在学术界引发了一场不小的风波。某些后殖民批评在望文生义中完成了误操作 :断言五四文论 (话语 )的现代转型是西方文化霸权对中国进行文化殖民的结果 ;郭沫若等中国知识分子主动接受西方文论的影响是“自我殖民化”。对五四以来大量引进西方文论的现象 ,只见其失 ,不见其得 ,或否定所得 ,这将导致对中国近现代文论史、文化史的片面理解 ,而且会令我们对五四以后中国新文化的评价出现巨大的价值混乱 ,对于这种批评倾向 ,是应努力予以澄清的 In the early 1990s, the theory of post-colonial criticism introduced into our country triggered a big stir in academia. Some postcolonial criticisms have done a wrong job in the context of the literary meaning: asserting that the modern transformation of the May 4th literary theory (discourse) is the result of the cultural colonization by the Western cultural hegemony toward China; Guo Mo-ruo and other Chinese intellectuals who voluntarily accepted the influence of western literary theory are “ Self colonization. ” Since the May 4th massacre of introducing a large number of western literary theories, we can only see the loss, the loss or the negative incomes that will lead to a one-sided understanding of the history of modern Chinese literary theory and cultural history, There is tremendous value chaos in the evaluation of China’s new culture and efforts should be made to clarify this tendency of criticism