论文部分内容阅读
“德雷特·司考特诉桑弗德”一案给我们留下了许多值得反思的东西 :“政治问题拒绝审查”原则在逻辑上是不成立的 ,它不足以成为违宪审查的界限 ;对“政治问题”的审查是“政治性”的 ,而不是“法律性”的 ;为了防止“政治问题”的肥大症、防止法官借口对“政治问题”审查的“法律性”而进行自我价值理念的逻辑走私、防止赤裸裸的法官专制等弊病的出现 ,必须建构违宪审查的“宪法界限”。
The case of “Drett Scottrade v. Sampfer” leaves us with many things worth reflecting on: the principle of “refusal of political examination” is not logically founded, and it is not enough to become the boundary of constitutional review; The review of “political issues” is “political” rather than “legal.” In order to prevent the hypertrophy of “political issues” and prevent judges from carrying out the concept of self-worth on the “legal nature” of censorship of “political issues” The logic of smuggling, to prevent the occurrence of ills such as the naked judge of autocracy, we must construct constitutional review of constitutional boundaries.