论文部分内容阅读
“拒绝司法”虽然是一个古老的国际法术语,但在国际投资法领域,其外延、适用前提以及救济途径都有了新的变化和发展。本文首先简述拒绝司法在有关国际投资条约中的表现;继而对国际投资仲裁实践中拒绝司法的传统救济途径进行论述;在此基础上,指明随着国际投资仲裁实践的发展,拒绝司法救济业已出现或可能会出现的新途径,并结合实际案例分析这些新途径的特征,以及其与传统意义上拒绝司法的区别与联系;最后针对这些新的救济途径提出相应的对策分析。
Although “denial of justice” is an ancient term of international law, new changes and developments have taken place in the field of international investment law in terms of its extension, applicable premises and remedial channels. This article first outlines the refusal of judicial performance in the relevant international investment treaties; and then discusses the traditional remedies for denial of justice in the practice of international investment arbitration. On this basis, it indicates that with the development of international investment arbitration practice, the refusal of judicial relief New or emerging approaches that may or may not arise, and analyze the characteristics of these new approaches combined with actual cases, as well as their differences from the traditional sense of denial of justice; and finally propose corresponding countermeasures for these new remedies.