论文部分内容阅读
刑事司法解释是由立法机关授权的最高司法机关就如何具体应用刑法、刑事诉讼法所作出的最有普遍约束力的解释。自1981年6月10日全国人大常委会作出《关于加强法律解释工作的决议》(以下简称《决议》)之后,最高人民法院、最高人民检察院(以下简称“两高”)加强了司法解释工作,先后颁布了大量刑事司法解释,为各级司法机关正确适用刑事法律,打击犯罪发挥了积极作用。但司法解释工作存在的问题,也给各级司法机关适用刑事司法解释带来一些困难。本文试就刑事司法解释适用中若干争议较大的问题,略陈管见。一、刑事司法解释内容有矛盾时如何适用的问题一般而言,司法解释是不会出现矛盾的,但由于各种原因,刑事司法解释有时也会出现矛盾,甚至解释有误或不妥当。表现在:(一)刑事司法解释与刑事立法(包括刑事立法解释)
Criminal judicial interpretation is the most universal binding interpretation on how to apply criminal law and criminal procedure law by the Supreme Judicial Authority authorized by the legislature. Since the resolution of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on strengthening legal interpretation was made on June 10, 1981 (hereinafter referred to as “the resolution”), the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate (hereinafter referred to as the “Supreme Court”) have strengthened their judicial Interpretation work has promulgated a large number of criminal judicial interpretation, which has played an active role in correctly applying criminal law and cracking down crimes at all levels of judicial organs. However, the problems existing in the judicial interpretation work also bring some difficulties to the judicial organs at all levels for applying criminal judicial interpretation. This article tries to explain some of the more controversial issues in the application of criminal justice interpretation. First, the contents of criminal justice interpretation of how the contradictions in the application of the problem Generally speaking, the judicial interpretation is not contradictory, but due to various reasons, the interpretation of criminal justice and sometimes there will be contradictions, and even explanations of errors or inappropriate. Manifested in: (a) the interpretation of criminal justice and criminal legislation (including the interpretation of criminal legislation)