论文部分内容阅读
目的对常用中文数据库中国知网(CNKI)、维普资讯(VIP)和万方数据知识服务平台数据库(WANGFANGDA-TA)和国家科技图书文献中心(NSTL)的收录资源进行比较。方法 分别从上述数据库的官方网站获取其收录期刊目录,并与统计源期刊(2010版)、核心期刊(2008版)和高被引期刊(2010版)收录资源做对比分析。结果 CNKI、VIP、WAN-FANG和NSTL收录中文期刊分别为8 058、15 030、6 537、9 226种。统计源期刊(2010版)、核心期刊(2008版)和高被引期刊(2010版)所涵盖期刊分别为1 723种、1 983种和5 212种,常用数据库对重要核心期刊的收录超过80%。结论 数据库十分重视对重要核心期刊的收录,收录资源既有重复,也存有差异,各有特色。
Objective To compare the included resources of CNKI, VIP, WANGFANGDA-TA and NSTL in Chinese databases. Methods The catalogs of the journals included in the database were obtained from the official websites of the above databases respectively, and compared with the sources of the statistical source journals (2010 edition), core journals (2008 edition) and highly cited journals (2010 edition). Results CNKI, VIP, WAN-FANG and NSTL included 8 058, 15 030, 6 537 and 9 226 Chinese periodicals respectively. The periodicals covered by Statistics Source Journal (2010 Edition), Core Periodicals (2008 Edition) and Highly Cited Periodicals (2010 Edition) were 1 723 species, 1 983 species and 5 212 species, respectively. Commonly used databases included over 80 key journals %. Conclusion The database attaches great importance to the collection of important core journals. The collected resources have both repetition and differences, and have their own characteristics.