论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析1~3岁留守儿童语言发育迟缓的临床干预效果。方法:选用本市200名1~3岁留守儿童进行研究分析。对所有儿童采取语言康复训练及语言环境结合的方法进行干预,观察并仔细记录干预前后的儿童语言发育商,比较不同儿童的语言发育商情况。结果:干预前,留守儿童的语言发育商为(94.628±8.435),干预后,其语言发育商为(102.28±6.253),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预前,男童和女童的语言发育商比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),干预后,男童语言发育商为(96.411±8.656),女童为(101.223±8.224),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对1~3岁的留守儿童采用改善语言环境和加强语言康复训练的干预方案,能够有效促进留守儿童的语言发育商快速成长,令其语言发育速度接近正常儿童,临床效果较为良好。
Objective: To analyze the effect of clinical intervention on language retardation in left-behind children aged 1 ~ 3 years. Methods: 200 children from 1 to 3 years old in our city were selected for study and analysis. To all children take language rehabilitation training and the combination of the language environment to intervene, observe and carefully record before and after the child language development business, comparison of language development of different children’s situation. Results: Before the intervention, the language development quotient of children left behind was (94.628 ± 8.435). After intervention, the language development quotient was (102.28 ± 6.253), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Before the intervention, there was no significant difference between boys and girls in language development (P> 0.05). After intervention, boys’ language development was (96.411 ± 8.656) and girls were (101.223 ± 8.224), the difference was statistically significant Significance (P <0.05). Conclusion: Interventions for left-behind children aged 1-3 years with improved language environment and language rehabilitation training can effectively promote the rapid growth of language developers of left-behind children and make their language development rate close to that of normal children. The clinical effect is relatively good.