具有資产阶級“人性論”观点的同志,总是念念不忘于什么“普遍的人性”,喜欢片面强調人的思想性格的复杂性,用一些抽象的美丽的詞句来掩盖人的阶級本质,抹煞人的阶級性和政治傾向性,代之以“人性”、“人类爱”这类抽象的概念。郭汉城同志在一篇分析蒲剧《薛刚反朝》的論文中,就申述过这样一种議論,他說:“人們往往有这样一种心理,一个人死了,就努力去記起他活着时的好处,不再批評他那些微小的过失,这也許是一种脆弱的心理,但也是一种可貴的品德。对于前人的尊敬,也是对于自己的尊重。”郭汉城同志是想用这一論点来說明,薛猛刚刚在因父母屈死而悲痛欲絕之后,就再三批評父母生前的过失,是感情太浅薄、冷酷了。对于薛猛应不应当批評他的父母生前的过失,是可以作具体的分析的。但这里的問題不在于此,而在于在这段一般性的議論中表現出所謂“人类爱”的資产阶級观点,用抽象的人性、心理的观点来代替阶級观点。我們知道,品評某一个人的好处或过失不是一般心理现象的問題,在阶級社会里, Comrades who hold the view of bourgeois “human nature” are always remembered for what they call “universal humanity.” They like to unilaterally emphasize the complexity of the ideological character of a person, conceal the essence of the class with some abstract and beautiful words, To deny people the class nature and political orientation, and replace them with such abstract concepts as “human nature” and “human love.” Comrade Guo Hancheng, in an essay on the analysis of the Pu Opera “Xue Gang against the DPRK”, submitted a remark in which he said: “People often have such a mentality that when one dies, he tries hard to remember him The benefits of living, no longer criticizing his minor mistakes, which may be a fragile mentality, but also a valuable character, respect for the predecessors, but also for their own respect. ”Comrade Guo Hancheng want to use This argument shows that after Xue Meng was grieved at his parents’ death, he repeatedly criticized the negligence of his parents during his lifetime as a feeling too shallow and cold. It should be possible to make a detailed analysis of why Xue Meng should not criticize the mistakes of his parents during their lifetime. But here lies not the problem, but the bourgeois point of view that shows so-called “human love” in this general argument, replacing the class point of view with a view of abstract humanity and psychology. We know that it is not a matter of general psychology to judge the benefits or negligence of a particular individual. In a class society,