我国的语言学,同国家各方面繁荣兴盛相适应,进入了当前的昌盛时代。任何一门学科,在任何一个时代,总存在着新旧更替、彼此消长,总存在相斥相引、相离相融。时或为方塘清莹,时或为万倾浩渺,以呈现此学术一个时代的精神、一个时代的风貌。语言学自亦如是。乾嘉之学,其学风上优良传统之朴实,其“小学”方面之理论、方法,并不随“乾嘉”二字的历史标名成为陈迹,其活力仍为学人所依赖而为当前做出贡献。欧风东渐,与“学西方”相会,于是“小学”遂进而为“语言文字之学”。在今日言之,是亦为“传统语言学”。其植根甚深,其理论与方法,仍为今日语言学发展之重要基础与借鉴。近十多年来,语言学新说蜂起,各以其所见以探索语言之真蕴,皆足以自立而呈功。以上三者,乾嘉语文学,传统语言学,新兴语言学,并存于时,为世所用。此三者,在马克思主 The linguistics of our country has adapted to the prosperous prosperity of all aspects of our country and has entered the current prosperous period. Any discipline, in any one era, there is always the old and new changes, each other’s growth and decline, there is always the opposite replies, blending. When or for Fang Tong Qing Ying, or for the Wan Qing vast, in order to present the academic spirit of an era, a style of the times. Linguistics is also true. The theory and method of “primary school” in Qiangya’s learning style are not simple with the historical naming of “Qianjia”. Its vitality is still relied on by scholars and is currently being done To contribute. The European style moved eastward to meet with “learning the West,” and “primary school” went on to become “a science of language and writing.” In today’s word, it is also “traditional linguistics.” Its deep roots, its theory and method, is still an important foundation and reference for the development of linguistics today. In the past ten years or so, new theories of linguistics came into being. Each of them explored the true meaning of language with their own opinions, which are enough to stand on their own and show their merits. The above three, Ganjia language literature, traditional linguistics, emerging linguistics, coexist in time, for the world. The three are in Marxism