论文部分内容阅读
本文从总体上阐明了MEGA2第2部分(《资本论》及准备稿)对研究《资本论》的重大意义。首先说明马克思在实施“资本一般”计划过程中遭遇到“抽象”与“具体”的矛盾,因而原本限于研究抽象领域的“资本一般”计划逐渐被研究单个资本和社会总资本的“资本论”计划取代,马克思的经济学手稿也藉此具有两个不同的主题:“政治经济学批判”和“资本论”。其次,作者借助MEGA2第2部分的文本对马克思审订的《资本论》第1卷不同版本做了比较说明,指出它们各自的优势和特点;强调德文第2版的修订手稿对于研究“价值形成”的意义。作者还以“危机理论”和“信用理论”为例,说明恩格斯编辑的《资本论》在某些地方与马克思的意图不相符合。最后作者借助马克思的手稿和一些书信证明《资本论》无论在研究还是写作方面都远未结束。
This paper generally illustrates the great significance of MEGA2 Part 2 (“Capitalism” and its preparation) for the study of Capital. First of all, it shows that Marx encountered the contradiction between “abstraction ” and “concrete ” in the process of implementing “capital general ” plan. Therefore, “capital general ” plan, which was limited to research abstract field, Social capital “” capital “plan to replace, Marx’s economic manuscript also take two different themes: ” Critique of political economy “and ” capital theory “. Second, the author uses the text of Part 2 of MEGA2 to compare the different versions of Volume 1 of Capital, which was reviewed by Marx, pointing out their respective strengths and characteristics. It emphasizes that the revised German version of the second edition is of great value to the study of ” Form a “meaning. The author also uses ”Crisis Theory“ and ”Credit Theory“ as examples to show that Engels’s ”Capital Theory“ does not accord with Marx’s intention in some places. Finally, the author uses Marx’s manuscript and some epistles to prove that ”capitalism" is far from over in terms of research and writing.