论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析研究米非司酮两种不同的服用方法用于药物流产的效果,对临床用药的方法进行指导。方法:随机选取2009年1月至2012年1月在我院自愿药物终止妊娠患者162例进行了分析研究,将患者随机分为观察组和对照组,每组患者各81例,对照组采取分层服用的方法,观察组使用顿服法服药。结果:两组患者在腹痛产生时间、阴道出血、药物副作用等方面都无显著性的差异(P>0.05)。结论:两组不同的服药方法虽然在产生的效果方面无明显的差异,但是观察组顿服的方法,更容易被患者接受,也更方便患者使用。但是总的来讲,药物流产对妇女身体有一定的影响,应当少用。
Objective: To analyze the effect of two different taking methods of mifepristone for medical abortion and to guide the method of clinical use. Methods: A total of 162 patients with termination of pregnancy voluntarily in our hospital from January 2009 to January 2012 were randomly selected and analyzed. The patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 81 patients in each group. The control group was divided into two groups Layer taking method, the observation group using Dayton method medication. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in the time of abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding and drug side effects (P> 0.05). Conclusion: Although there are no obvious differences between the two groups in taking the drug, the method of treating the patients in the observation group is more easily accepted by the patients and more convenient for the patients to use. However, in general, medical abortion affects women’s health to some extent and should be used less frequently.