论文部分内容阅读
为了比较科斯手段与庇古手段对我国生态补偿的效率,本文以我国园林和绿地自然资源为例,采用30个省份2006—2008年的绿地面积以及政府投入年度面板数据建立线性回归模型,进而运用成本—收益原理进行实证分析。研究表明,所有权归属政府、经营权归属私人的产权配置方式能有效减少生态损失;政府每投入1万元,中国的城市园林和绿地面积将增加0.041公顷,证明了庇古手段对中国生态补偿确实有明显效果;各地区回归模型截距项不同,说明各地区的初始绿化情况有所差异。中国现阶段园林与绿地建设应采取庇古手段为主、科斯手段为辅的补偿机制。
In order to compare the efficiency of Coase and Pigou eco-compensation to our country, this paper takes the natural resources of gardens and green land in our country as an example, establishes a linear regression model using the green area of 30 provinces from 2006 to 2008 and the annual panel data of government investment, Cost-income principle for empirical analysis. Research shows that ownership of ownership of the government vested in private ownership of the property rights can effectively reduce the ecological loss; the government invested 10,000 yuan, China’s urban gardens and green area will increase 0.041 hectares, demonstrating the Pigou means of ecological compensation in China is indeed Which has obvious effect. The interregional regression models of different regions are different, indicating that the initial afforestation situation in each region is different. At present, the construction of gardens and greenbelt in China should adopt the compensation mechanism supplemented mainly by Pigou means and Coase means.