论文部分内容阅读
日前,最高人民法院召开新闻通气会,向社会发布了八起典型案例。其中,包括两起典型商标案例:一是山东宏济堂制药集团有限公司与山东宏济堂阿胶有限公司等侵害商标权、不正当竞争纠纷案,对涉及因历史原因造成的老字号权利冲突案件的处理具有典型指导意义;二是温州荣盛贸易有限公司诉温州市工商行政管理局鹿城分局工商行政处罚案,是行政机关对侵犯知识产权的行为进行查处,产生行政争议的典型案例。
Recently, the Supreme People’s Court held a press briefing and released eight typical cases to the public. Including two typical trademark cases: First, Shandong Hongjitang Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. and Shandong Hongji Tang Ejiao Co., Ltd. and other infringement of trademark rights, unfair competition dispute case, involving the historical reasons for the old conflict of rights cases Second, the Wenzhou Rongsheng Trade Co., Ltd. sue Wenzhou City Administration for Industry and Commerce Lucheng branch administrative penalty cases, is the administrative organ on intellectual property rights violations investigated and dealt with, resulting in administrative disputes typical case.