论文部分内容阅读
日前,因产品质量危机而处在舆论风口浪尖中的锦湖轮胎,终于作出召回所有违规产品的承诺,然而负责该产品危机处理的代理律师黄进,却突然宣称对对方未履行代理前签订的风险合同不满,要和锦湖轮胎对簿公堂,并公开索要24亿律师费。此言一出,舆论哗然。24亿元的“天价律师费”到底是合理的劳动报酬,还是“狮子大开口”式的敲竹杠,一时间引发了民众的热议。
Recently, due to product quality crisis in the cusp of public opinion in the Kumho Tire, and finally made a commitment to recall all non-compliant products, however, responsible for the crisis of the product attorney Huang Jin suddenly claimed that the other party did not fulfill the pre-signing agency risk Dissatisfied with the contract, and Kumho Tire to court, and openly solicited 2.4 billion lawyers fee. This remark out, uproar in public opinion. 2.4 billion yuan “sky-high attorney fee ” in the end is a reasonable remuneration package, or “Lions big mouth ” type hurdle, for a time aroused public hot.