论文部分内容阅读
史志之争,由来已久,至今还让人莫衷一是。这一问题能否搞清楚,对当前的编史修志有不小的影响。有些地方既在编史,又在修志,它们各自为阵分头作战,做了不少的重复劳动,如能明白其中的异同,是有利于相互借鉴与发展的。一我国清代著名方志学家章学诚在《遗书》卷十四《州县请立志科议》中写道: “有天下之史,有一国之史。有一家之史,有一人之
History of the dispute, a long time, is still incomprehensible. Whether this issue can be clarified or not will have a significant impact on the current editorial history. In some places, they are not only making history but also cultivating their own marks. They each worked in battles separately and did a lot of duplication of work. Being able to understand the similarities and differences between them is conducive to mutual reference and development. One of China’s famous Qing Dynasty Zhang Zhicheng historian in the “Sutra” Volume fourteen “county determined to science,” wrote: "There is a history of the world, there is a history of one country. There is a family history, one person