论文部分内容阅读
小区内道路旁边的场地属于业主共有的场地,有观点主张开发商与业主关于车位的约定违反了物权法74条第三款的强制性规定而无效。但是,在判断合同的效力性强制性规定时,还应当从该强制性规定是否明确规定了违反的后果是合同无效,违反该强制性规定继续履行合同是否会损害国家、集体、第三人利益及社会公共利益,违反该强制性规定是否会违背我国相关法律的立法宗旨等方面进行综合分析。
Neighborhood venues next to the road belongs to the owners of the site, there is a point of view advocates developers and owners of parking spaces in violation of the provisions of Article 74 of the third paragraph of mandatory provisions and null and void. However, when judging the mandatory provisions of the contract, whether it should be clearly stipulated in the mandatory provision whether the contract is invalid or not and whether the continued performance of the contract in violation of the mandatory provisions will harm the interests of the state, the collective or the third party And social and public interests, the violation of the mandatory provisions will violate the relevant laws of our country’s legislative purposes and other aspects of a comprehensive analysis.