论文部分内容阅读
对不同种类的物权请求权可作具体分析,以确定其是否适用诉讼时效制度。诉讼时效制度的价值追求主要在于维护市场交易安全与社会秩序,据此可建立一套考察路径用以分析具体的物权请求权。遵循该路径,不登记的动产以及采登记对抗主义的动产的物权人之返还请求权应适用诉讼时效,而物权之排除妨碍请求权、消除危险请求权、停止侵害请求权以及不动产与依法应为登记并已登记的动产之返还请求权不应适用诉讼时效。
The different types of claims can be analyzed specifically to determine whether they apply the statute of limitations. The value pursuit of the system of limitation of action mainly lies in the maintenance of market transaction security and social order, so that a set of inspection path can be established to analyze the specific right of claim. According to this path, non-registration of movable property and acquisition of confiscation of movable property owner’s right of claim shall apply for the limitation of action, while the exclusion of property rights obstruct the claim, eliminate the claim of danger, stop the claim and immovable property and law The limitation of action shall not apply to the right to return a movable property registered and registered.