论文部分内容阅读
宪法解释学与规范宪法学两种方法论,在实践面向、适用的场域、目的架构与本质上均存在着根本的差异,其根本原因在于它们属于不同的方法论,宪法解释学属于宪法方法论,规范宪法学属于宪法学方法论。宪法解释学方法论具有独断性,而规范宪法学方法论则必然具有开放性。或许一切问题的焦点皆在于两种方法论的对峙以及对问题实质的理解上。
The two methods of constitutional hermeneutics and normative constitutional law are fundamentally different in the fields of practice, applicable field, purpose and structure. The fundamental reason is that they belong to different methodologies. Constitutional hermeneutics belongs to constitutional methodology and norms Constitutional law belongs to constitutional methodology. The methodology of constitutional hermeneutics is arbitrary, while the methodology of constitutional law is bound to be open. Perhaps the focus of all questions lies in the confrontation between the two methodologies and the substantive understanding of the issue.