论文部分内容阅读
学术研究与学术评价相辅相成,学术研究内在地要求学术评价,而学术评价则促进学术研究,学术评价的缺失必将损害并阻碍学术研究与学术进步。就当代中国法学学术评价机制而言,很有必要从法学学术研究成果的政治向度、立足于中国法律实践的问题意识、基于思想与理论性“问题”还是实践性“问题”或者对策性“问题”之解决的研究目的设定、学术资源的利用情况、显性效果情况、在中外法学界和法律实务界以及与非法学学科的对话能力、学术规范化情况、学术品位与层次、学术风格样态、对于中国法学学术传统塑造的意义这十个方面,来建构作为其核心成分的中国法学学术评价基准。
Academic research and academic evaluation complement each other, academic research inherently requires academic evaluation, and academic evaluation promotes academic research. The absence of academic evaluation is bound to undermine and hinder academic research and academic progress. In terms of the academic evaluation mechanism of contemporary Chinese jurisprudence, it is necessary to change the political orientation of the academic achievements of law research from the perspective of the legal consciousness of the Chinese legal practice, based on the ideological and theoretical nature of the issue of “question” or “practicality” Or the solution to the problem “problem ”, the use of academic resources, the effect of dominance, in Chinese and foreign jurisprudence and legal practice as well as the dialogue with the illegitimate disciplines, the academic standardization of academic grade And the level, the style of academic styles, and the significance of shaping the legal tradition of Chinese jurisprudence to construct the academic evaluation standard of Chinese law as its core component.