出资多的人相对来说承担的风险和责任也比较大,权利跟风险和责任对应才是比较合理的,在董事会席位分配上,有此原则。前几天,我的一个学生,一个公司老板的夫人,向我咨询这样一件事:她老公占公司67%的股份,另外两个小股东,一个是11%,一个是22%,两个小股东提议成立三人董事会,三个股东做董事,并且各占一个席位,有一个小股东甚至提出要让自己的老婆担任监事,她的老公同意了。我的学生认为这样做不对,可是她老公却认为没有问题,两人为此吵得不可开交,她就打电话问我这样是不是可以。显然,她老公犯了一个很大的错误,在股东会,他有67%的投票权,但是在董事会,他却只有三分之一(33%)的投票权,这就意味着他的控制 Relatively large amount of people who invest more risk and responsibility, and rights and risks and responsibilities corresponding to the more reasonable, the allocation of seats in the board of directors, have this principle. A few days ago, one of my students, the wife of a company boss, consulted me about the fact that her husband made up 67% of the company and the other two were 11%, one 22% and two Small shareholders proposed the establishment of a three-person board of directors, three shareholders as directors and one for each seat. One minority shareholder even proposed that his wife be supervisor, and her husband agreed. My students think this is wrong, but her husband did not think there was any problem, and the two argued so much that she called to ask me if that was OK. Obviously, her husband made a big mistake at the shareholders meeting, he has 67% of the voting rights, but in the board of directors, he has only one-third (33%) of the voting rights, which means that his control