论文部分内容阅读
本文在对落花诗创作源流作简要追溯的基础上,排比文徵明所书小楷落花诗的不同版本。有记录的七种版本中,有册页、扇面、卷子等形制,兹主要对周氏琴几轩本(《吴越所见书画录》存详细记录)、过云楼补图本(存过云楼集帖翻本)、苏博藏经纸本、刘氏虚白斋本等四种,逐一进行考察。针对启功先生认为刘氏虚白斋本为“唯一可证可信的一卷真品”的说法,通过对四种版本的书写字体、行格大小、题跋内容的多寡、文氏印记及收藏源流各方面,作详细比勘,提出不同看法,认为仅凭出现参差不齐的壁、璧变换,不足以判定其真伪、优劣。且它们相互之间并不存在母子关系,有理由相信,目前所知的四种《落花诗》如是真迹,则应是文徵明在不同时间用不同纸、笔所书。
Based on a brief tracing of the origin of the flowering poems, this paper ranks different versions of the poems written by the poem written by Wen Wenming. There are seven versions of the record, there are albums, fan, paper and other forms of volume, it is mainly on the piano weeks Xuan Ben (“Wu Yue see painting and calligraphy records” detailed records) Set posts turn the book), Su Bo Tibetan scriptures, Liu’s imaginary white copy of the four, one by one inspection. According to Mr. Qigong’s view that Liu’s imaginary name is “the only authentic certificate that can be authenticated”, through the four versions of writing fonts, the size of the line, the content of inscriptions, Wen’s imprint and Collect all aspects of origin, make a detailed survey, put forward different views, that the emergence of uneven wall, bi change, not enough to determine the authenticity, merits and demerits. And they do not exist between mother and child, there is reason to believe that the four known “falling poems” is authentic, it should be Wen Zhengming at different times with different paper, pen book.