关于“北平美术作家协会”的介绍,虽然因那场著名的“国画论战”为中国现代美术史所传载,但若细加探究,则又主要侧重于对事件过程的叙述和对徐悲鸿艺术思想的分析,而对该团体成立目的、团体名称、成立时间、组织机构、会员人数及主要活动诸项,反倒显得含糊不清,以致众说纷纭。举个例子说,即以徐悲鸿在该会中的身份,就有“协会主席”、“名誉主席”、“会长”、“名誉会长”、“荣誉会长”等等不同的名目,来自当事人的记忆、研究著述及当时报刊消息等不同渠道,这样的叙述经过数十年的繁衍转述,更显得扑朔迷离,为后来者清晰地了解当时的史实真相设置了障碍,不利于深入、客观地研 Although the introduction of the “Peking Academy of Fine Arts Writers” is well-known in the history of modern Chinese art because of the famous “Battle of Traditional Chinese Painting,” it is mainly about the narration of the incident process The analysis of Xu Beihong’s artistic thought, however, is rather vague on the purpose of establishing the group, the name of the group, the time of establishment, the organization, the number of members and the major activities. For example, to Xu Beihong in the identity of the association, there are “association chairman ”, “honorary chairman ”, “president ”, “honorary president ”, “honorary Long, ”and so on different names, from the parties’ memory, research publications and then newspapers and other different channels, such narrative after decades of reproductive rendition, even more complicated and confusing, for those who later clearly understand the historical truth setting Obstacles, is not conducive to in-depth, objective research