论文部分内容阅读
《文选》题注与作者注对于解读《文选》作品颇为重要,但其问题甚是复杂,或是羼乱,或有谬误。本文择其中问题较显著者略分数类,依类举例,并逐条考释,试从整体上辨其真伪,以总结《文选》题注与作者注羼乱之特征,探讨羼乱之根源,并对谬误之处随文考证。结论认为学者据通行《文选》版本以评价、引据《文选》题注与作者注,必须对其究属何家注释有所辨别,以免无的放矢。
The Notes and Author Notes of “Wenxuan” are quite important for interpreting the works of “Wenxuan”, but the problems are complicated, disorganized or fallacious. In this paper, we choose the most significant problems among them, according to the classifications, classifying them according to categories and examining them one by one, trying to find out the authenticity from the whole, summarizing the characteristics of “Wenxuan” and “ On the fallacy of the text with the textual research. The conclusion is that the scholar according to the passage of ”Wenxuan“ version to evaluate, cited the ”anthologies" and the author’s note, you must comment on what is their home, so as not to aimlessly.