论文部分内容阅读
江西二二四煤田地质勘探队对山南井田大禾山段运用岩性、电测井曲线旋回分析及室内多项分析鉴定方法进行煤层综合对比,取得了显著成果。我们配合作了有关对比试验项目,按照一定的网度、密度,选择十五个钻孔作为标准对比孔,系统采取了煤样和岩样共1503组,经过分析和鉴定,得到了共25000个数据及1400余份报告,这些数据和报告,对煤层的对比提供了依据,使目前的煤层对比方案更趋可靠。关于山南井田概况和测井曲线旋回分析部分,在《煤田地质与勘探》一九七七年第四期《山南井田岩、煤层组段对比》一文中已作过介绍。本文仅将岩矿鉴定、重矿物鉴定、
Jiangxi 224 Coalfield Geological Exploration Team made a comprehensive comparison of the coal seams on the Daheshan Section of Shannan Minefield using lithology, electrical logging curve-cycle analysis and multiple indoor analysis and identification methods, and achieved remarkable results. We cooperate with the relevant pilot projects, according to a certain degree of network density, choose 15 holes as a standard comparison hole, the system has taken a total of 1503 groups of coal samples and rock samples, after analysis and identification, a total of 25,000 Data and more than 1,400 reports, these data and reports provide a basis for the comparison of the coal seams, making the current coal seam comparison program more reliable. About the overview of Shannan well field and the part of the analysis of the well logging curve, it was introduced in “Coalfield Geology and Exploration”, the fourth issue of “Comparison of Rock and Coal Seams in Shannan Mine Field” in 1977. This article only rock identification, heavy mineral identification,