一、问题的提出陆机的《拟古诗》是最能体现西晋时期文坛上盛行的模拟风气的诗歌作品,并因锺嵘在《诗品》中的高度评价以及被收录到《昭明文选》中,而成为公认的两晋南北朝时期拟古类作品的典范。然而明清以来,这组创作却屡遭非议,以陈祚明、许学夷、王夫之、贺贻孙、李重华等人为代表的文学批评家们,认为《拟古诗》对原作逐句模仿、亦步亦趋,未得古诗之情志、神思。当代学术界对《拟古诗》的评判,虽然从最初的片面认为这组诗是形式主义的产物、没有实质内容,转移到肯定陆机在艺术技巧上的突出成就以及在五言诗发展历史上的地位,但对于《拟古诗》的思想内容,大体上仍导古人机杼。孙明君先生认为《拟古诗》十二首不仅主题与原作相同,字句也与原作基本对应,是陆机 First, the problem raised Lu Ji’s “Classical Poetry” is the best embodiment of the Western literary world popular analogy poetry works, and because of Zhong Rong in the “poetry” in the highly praised and was included in “Zhao Ming anthologies” , And became recognized as a model for the ancient classics of the Jin and Southern and Northern Dynasties. However, since the Ming and Qing Dynasties, this group of writings has been repeatedly criticized. Literary critics represented by Chen Zuoming, Xu Xueyi, Wang Fuzhi, He Yisun, Li Zhonghua and others think that “imitation of ancient poetry” imitates and imitates the original one by one. Chi, God thinking. Although the judgments of “imitating ancient poems” in contemporary academia from the initial one-sided view are that these poems are the products of formalism and have no substantive content, they are transferred to recognizing the outstanding achievements of Lu Ji in his artistic skills and his position in the historical development of Wuyan Poems, But for “the ancient poetry,” the ideological content, in general, still lead the ancients. Mr. Sun Mingjun that “the ancient poems,” the first twelve not only the same theme with the original, the word also corresponds with the original basic is Lu Ji