论文部分内容阅读
《法哲学视野下的法律论证研究》从法哲学的视角研究了法律论证的基本问题,通过对与司法裁决息息相关的重大问题的哲学省察,凸显了法律论证这一中枢。宽容的司法克制主义立场、司法裁决的可接受性、认识论困境的解决、法律论证类型、法律解释的语义后果和证成、事实命题的确立和法律证据的证成、法律的因果关系、司法裁决客观性的实现及其方式以及民意和司法效果等等,无一不与法律论证攸关。在法律论证概念的界定,司法克制主义和司法能动主义的平衡,推论方式本身的证成,法律论证认识论的检讨,法律论证评价思路的转换,对生活事实命题、法律事实命题、证据和待证事实命题的区分、联系和转换的精细阐述,以及对一种“正确的法律论证因果观”的倡导诸方面,多有出彩之处。当然,百密总有一疏,一些论述也有商榷余地。
From the perspective of jurisprudence, this paper studies the basic problems of legal argumentation. Through the philosophical examination of major issues that are closely related to judicial decisions, the central point of legal argumentation is highlighted. Tolerant judicial restraint, the acceptability of judicial adjudication, the solution of the plight of epistemology, the type of legal argumentation, the semantic consequences and justification of legal interpretation, the establishment of factual propositions and the proof of legal evidence, the causal relationship of law, the judicial ruling The realization of objectivity and its methods as well as public opinions and judicial effects are all closely related to legal argumentation. In the definition of the concept of legal argumentation, the balance between judicial restraint and judicial activism, the justification of inference method itself, the review of epistemology of legal argumentation, the conversion of legal argumentation and evaluation mentality, the proposition of living fact, the proposition of legal fact, The distinction between factual propositions, the elaboration of connections and transformations, and the advocacy of a “causal view of legal justification” have many bright spots. Of course, there is always a mystery in the company, some of the discussions are open to question.