论文部分内容阅读
长期以来,我国理论界、实务界对工伤保险赔付与普通侵权损害赔偿竞合时的法律适用问题看法不一,相关立法的规定或不够明确具体,或相互抵触,导致司法裁判的标准和依据不够统一,不仅损害了司法的公平与权威,而且难以衡平当事人权益与社会公共利益。文章首先从法理视角分析了工伤保险赔付与普通侵权损害赔偿的性质及相互关系,进而论述了工伤保险赔付与普通侵权损害赔偿竞合时的法律适用模式及其缺陷,最后提出了完善工伤保险赔付与普通侵权损害赔偿冲突解决机制的设想。
For a long time, China’s theoretical and practical circles have different opinions on the legal application of compensation for industrial injury insurance and the compensation for damages for ordinary infringement. The provisions of the relevant legislation are not specific enough or contradict each other, resulting in insufficient standards and basis for judicial adjudication Unification not only undermines the fairness and authority of the judiciary, but also makes it difficult to balance the rights and interests of the parties and the public interest. The article first analyzes the nature and relationship of compensation for work-related injury insurance and compensation for ordinary tort from the legal point of view, and then discusses the legal applicable mode and its defects when the work-related injury insurance compensation and ordinary tort damages are competing. At last, Tentative Ideas on the Settlement Mechanism of Conflict with General Infringement Damages.